🐙 Perbedaan Amd Dan Nvidia It is remarkable, this amusing message

dsitu d test ternyata klo nvidia emang avg fps ny lebih tinggi, tapi begitu d kasih msaa lbh dr 4x performa ny jadi drop, sedangkan amd walau lbh kecil avg fps ny tpi klo d hajar msaa ny perubahan fps ny linear jd ny klo msaa ud smpe 8x lbh fps amd mlh lbh tinggi gan y kita semua tau klo on paper spec amd lbh gede mungkin ini jg sebabny

KelemahanAMD Radeon adalah tidak support physx, sedangkan kelemahan NVIDIA adalah lebih boros listrik, dan kalau mau menggunakan stereoscopic harus SLI. Padahal seperti yang diketahui, kita butuh power yang besar untuk bermain game. AMD Radeon juga lebih unggul dari segi harga.

AMD x Nvidia qual é a diferença entre eles? A diferença mais básica entre GPUs da AMD e da Nvidia é que os chips Nvidia tendem a ser mais poderosos, especialmente no topo de linha, enquanto as placas da AMD oferecem melhor custo-benefício e uma interface de usuário mais fácil de usar. Este artigo contém Este artigo contém A AMD e a Nvidia são as duas maiores fabricantes de placas de vídeo e travam uma batalha contínua pela supremacia da GPU que resultou em uma ampla gama de opções de novos processadores no mercado que atendem a várias preferências, níveis de desempenho e orçamentos do consumidor. Embora seus produtos top de linha não tenham muitas diferenças, as placas de baixo custo da AMD oferecem um forte valor a um preço acessível. No nível intermediário, a comparação entre placas de vídeo AMD e Nvidia é difícil há pouca diferença entre os dois fabricantes. Ao comprar uma GPU da AMD ou da Nvidia, você receberá uma GPU poderosa com muitas funcionalidades. GPU AMD x Nvidia Preços As duas empresas oferecem muitos modelos em uma ampla faixa de preços, mas as GPUs da AMD têm preços mais competitivos e mais acessíveis na faixa de baixo a médio. Embora haja placas de vídeo AMD com preço relativamente baixo de US$ 200 que correspondam ao desempenho das concorrentes da Nvidia significativamente mais caras, a Nvidia se sai melhor com GPUs intermediárias e de ponta, em que o nível de recursos e desempenho e oferece o melhor desempenho para aqueles que podem pagar. Mas a GPU com melhor custo-benefício pode ser determinada apenas com uma pesquisa prática nas especificações de desempenho de modelos específicos. Existem muitos sites de comparação para ajudar a fazer um bom negócio, e alguns informam até o FPS que cada placa pode atingir em jogos específicos. GPU AMD x Nvidia Desempenho em jogos Além das especificações subjacentes, como velocidade do clock e RAM de vídeo VRAM, você precisa pensar no equilíbrio entre qualidade de textura e FPS que os modelos de GPU oferecem a jogos específicos. Mas escolher entre AMD ou Nvidia para sua plataforma de jogos pode ser complicado ao considerar recursos mais avançados. Se você valoriza uma experiência totalmente imersiva com recursos gráficos aprimorados, convém pagar mais para obter a tecnologia Deep Learning Super Sampling DLSS da Nvidia, que otimiza o traçado de raios, uma técnica de renderização habilitada por IA que pode modelar efeitos de luz com realismo impressionante. A AMD usa uma técnica semelhante chamada FSR, mas ainda não é capaz de oferecer efeitos como a luz do Sol atravessando nevoeiro e outras experiências de forma tão convincente. As GPUs Nvidia usam uma técnica conhecida como DLSS para modelar efeitos de luz ambiente ultrarrealistas. Não vê problema em sacrificar o traçado de raios para aumentar a taxa de quadros? Você provavelmente joga games online com vários jogadores e quer minimizar o atraso a todo custo. Nesse caso, use uma placa AMD com preço significativamente menor do que uma GPU Nvidia com desempenho nativo equivalente. Mesmo para jogos de um jogador, o fato de que as GPUs da AMD tendem a ter mais VRAM é um argumento poderoso para muitos usuários. Isso não só oferece potência extra para os jogos atuais, como também deixa seu computador pronto quando os jogos se tornarem inevitavelmente mais exigentes. Uma placa da AMD com VRAM de alta capacidade extra ajudará a preparar seu hardware para o futuro. Muitos jogadores também preferem o painel de controle da AMD pela interface fácil de usar e a capacidade de fazer overclock da GPU. Verifique apenas se não está superaquecendo sua CPU e outros componentes críticos ao fazer overclock. Como a AMD não atualiza os drivers de vídeo com a frequência da Nvidia, você pode enfrentar problemas de desempenho. GPU AMD x Nvidia Sincronização adaptativa Como em outras áreas, a AMD e a Nvidia são praticamente equivalentes quando se trata de sincronização adaptativa a capacidade de ajustar dinamicamente a taxa de atualização da tela para corresponder à saída do quadro da GPU. O recurso G-Sync da Nvidia oferece um desempenho absoluto ligeiramente melhor, enquanto a ferramenta FreeSync da AMD tenha um custo-benefício geralmente melhor. Os testes mostraram que a tecnologia de sincronização adaptativa da Nvidia é capaz de atingir uma latência menor e maior qualidade de imagem. Mas para obter os melhores resultados, uma GPU da Nvidia, como a RTX 3060 Ti, precisa ser usada com um monitor compatível. Assim, você fica preso ao preço combinado da placa de vídeo e do monitor, o que significa que não será possível fazer combinações para encaixar no seu orçamento. O FreeSync da AMD reduz os tempos de resposta, mas isso pode levar a ghosting. As diferenças entre o G-Sync e o FreeSync são pequenas e, como o hardware compatível com o FreeSync tem preço mais baixo, optar pelo G-Sync da Nvidia pode significar pagar muito mais por apenas um pequeno aumento no desempenho. O G-Sync da Nvidia ainda é o favorito dos gamers devido ao desempenho bruto inigualável. Mas entre as outras vantagens de orçamento e compatibilidade da AMD, seu recurso FreeSync também é compatível com os consoles Xbox e PlayStation da geração atual. GPU AMD x Nvidia Desempenho de laptop No caso das GPUs projetadas para laptops, a Nvidia é claramente a líder de mercado por conseguir produzir placas mais finas e de alto desempenho, com preços competitivos. Por esse motivo, a maior parte dos laptops vem equipada com uma GPU da Nvidia. Embora você possa comprar laptops com Radeon RX 6800 ou outra placa da AMD, é mais provável que encontre um com GPU da Nvidia, como 1650 gtx, 3080 ti ou 6800 xt. A Apple está em processo de transição da linha completa dos produtos MacBook para o hardware gráfico Apple Silicon, mas alguns modelos antigos ainda são equipados com GPUs de terceiros. Descubra qual é a placa de vídeo do seu Mac e se ela pode lidar com determinados jogos testando o desempenho do seu MacBook. AMD x Nvidia Qual é a melhor GPU? Se você quiser ostentar o luxo dos jogos de última geração, a RTX 2080 ti da Nvidia é provavelmente a melhor, mas a placa certa para você provavelmente é AMD ou Nvidia. Você pode decidir renunciar à definição Ultra HD ou 4K e usar o dinheiro economizado para experimentar uma série de novos jogos nos quais está interessado, ou talvez conseguir a maior velocidade de clock possível dentro de um determinado limite de orçamento. É difícil dizer se a Nvidia é melhor que a AMD, porque ambas as marcas têm muito a oferecer, dependendo do orçamento e das necessidades de desempenho. As placas de ponta de ambas alcançam resultados de desempenho semelhantes, mas o “vencedor” não é necessariamente aquele com as melhores pontuações de benchmark. Você precisa encontrar uma GPU que ofereça a experiência de usuário de que você precisa, com o equilíbrio certo entre preço e desempenho. A Radeon 6650 XT da AMD é uma das placas de vídeo mais poderosas do mercado. Como alternativa, você pode escolher uma GPU da Nvidia ou da AMD específica de acordo com o desempenho nos seus jogos favoritos. A beleza de montar o próprio PC para jogos é que você pode escolher todos os componentes. A rivalidade entre a Nvidia e a AMD significa que é possível encontrar algo que sirva para você, desde que reserve um tempo para considerar suas necessidades e pesquisar as opções. O que é uma GPU e para que ela serve? Uma GPU, ou unidade de processamento gráfico, é um poderoso processador que lida com a tarefa intensiva e complexa de renderização de gráficos durante jogos ou edição de vídeo. Por concentrar muito poder de computação em um único componente, as GPUs costumam ter ventiladores integrados para ajudar a evitar o superaquecimento. Embora sejam projetadas principalmente para processar gráficos, elas podem executar vários threads de processamento simultaneamente, o que as torna úteis para aprendizado de máquina e outros aplicativos sofisticados. É importante verificar sua placa de vídeo com outras especificações do PC para garantir que ela seja compatível com os outros hardwares e possa executar os aplicativos desejados. Não importa a velocidade da sua CPU ou o nível de otimização do Windows 10 para jogos, se a GPU não for potente o suficiente, será impossível rodar um jogo graficamente exigente em uma taxa de quadros estável. O que é uma GPU da AMD? Desde que a AMD adquiriu a empresa de gráficos ATI em 2006, ela produz GPUs cada vez mais competitivas e vem reduzindo a participação de mercado da Nvidia. Embora apenas as GPUs da AMD de ponta possuam os recursos de traço de raios impecáveis, as GPUs intermediárias da AMD oferecem excelente custo-benefício. Elas possibilitam jogar no PC com orçamentos menores, com comprometimento visual e de desempenho mínimo. Assim como a ultrapotente Radeon RX 6800 e placas de vídeo de baixo custo incrivelmente populares como a RX 6600, as GPUs da AMD são conhecidas pelo painel de controle fácil de usar e são elogiadas por sua insistência em manter a tecnologia de código aberto. O que é uma GPU da Nvidia? As GPUs Nvidia ainda são consideradas o padrão ouro de placas de vídeo, e seus recursos de traçado de raios e anti-lag são incomparáveis. Mas esse é um luxo caro, como a recém-lançada RTX 4080 que custa tanto quanto alguns PCs completos. Mas a Nvidia não fabrica apenas produtos premium e tecnologia de ponta. Dependendo das suas necessidades, uma placa Nvidia econômica, como a RTX 2060, pode ser mais adequada para você do que uma AMD, o que se reflete no fato de que a grande maioria dos jogadores do Steam usa placas de vídeo Nvidia. Melhore o desempenho do PC com o Avast Cleanup Seja qual for a marca, AMD ou Nvidia, garanta o melhor desempenho da sua GPU com um software de otimização como o Avast Cleanup. O Avast Cleanup apaga arquivos inúteis e bloatware que podem sobrecarregar o sistema e prejudicar a experiência de jogo. E graças à manutenção programada automática que corrige erros de disco e problemas de registro, você desfrutará de inicializações e processamentos mais rápidos. Teste o Avast Cleanup hoje mesmo e mantenha seu computador otimizado. Escrito por Publicado em Dezembro 8, 2022 Atualizado em Janeiro 24, 2023

4 Mendukung teknologi multi-display. AMD Radeon RX 560X. Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050. Kartu grafis ini mendukung teknologi multi-display, kamu bisa mengkonfigurasi beberapa monitor untuk menciptakan pengalaman main game yang lebih imersif, contohnya bisa mempunyai bidang pandang yang lebih luas. 5. suhu muat GPU. Tidak diketahui.

ApaPerbedaan VGA >> NVIDIA GeForce & ATI Radeon. sumber gambar.jalantikus.com. NVIDIA dan AMD adalah penyedia grafis yang sama-sama memiliki kelebihan masing-masing dimana semuannya sangat memiliki peran penting dalam menjalankan komputer. Apalagi untuk mereka yang sangat gemar bermain game dan desain grafis untuk pengeditan gambar atau video.

Home News Image credit Tom's Hardware AMD vs Nvidia. If you're building a gaming PC, you'll inevitably be faced with choosing between the two GPU heavyweights. Both companies make GPUs that power the best graphics cards, fighting for supremacy in our GPU benchmarks hierarchy. AMD vs Nvidia isn't the only decision you’ll need to make when building a PC, of course. You'll also need to choose between AMD vs Intel CPUs. Our focus here will be on graphics, however, and we'll be looking at performance, features, drivers and software, power and efficiency, pricing and more. The AMD vs Nvidia flame wars have been cooking since the late 90s, with Nvidia currently leading in the GPU arena by many metrics. Its graphics cards account for the majority of GPUs on the Steam Hardware Survey, for example, and in terms of pure finances, Nvidia is worth roughly three times as much as AMD with a large chunk of AMD's resources devoted to CPUs. But we're not interested in the distant past or finances. We want to find a winner in the current battle of AMD vs Nvidia GPUs. That primarily means looking at AMD Big Navi and Nvidia Ampere graphics cards — and maybe one of these days, we'll even need to add Intel Arc into the mix. It's important to keep the big picture in view throughout this analysis. We're not just focusing on the fastest GPU, or the most power-efficient GPU, or the best bang-for-the buck GPU. We'll consider all of the factors in each category, from budget to mid-range to high-end and extreme GPUs, along with the tech behind the GPUs. We will declare a winner today, but of course this isn't the end of the war. It's more like owning the heavyweight GPU title A victory today doesn't mean your opponent won't come back leaner and meaner next year. With that preamble out of the way, let's pull out the boxing gloves and go the rounds with AMD vs vs Nvidia Gaming Performance For decades, faster GPUs have enabled game developers to create increasingly detailed and complex worlds. While you can find everything from budget GPUs to high-end offerings from both AMD and Nvidia, when it comes to outright performance, Nvidia has a slight overall lead thanks to the chunky GeForce RTX 3090 Ti. Beyond the pole position, however, it's a closer match. If you look at our GPU benchmarks hierarchy, you'll see that AMD's RX 6950 XT owns the top spot at 1080p and 1440p, and Nvidia only wins at 4K or in ray tracing games. Of the top ten fastest GPUs, four are AMD and six are Nvidia, but part of that is thanks to quantity rather than truly different GPUs — the RTX 3080 12GB takes a bit of RTX 3080 Ti and a bit of RTX 3080 and mixes them together into a card that ended up matching the 3080 Ti at a lower price point. Of course, the main benchmarks only look at games running APIs and settings that work on all GPUs, which means we haven't included ray tracing or DLSS in the results. We also haven't included any FSR results, and CPU bottlenecks certainly play a role at lower resolutions. Here's the updated 2022 performance rankings, showing the overall performance from eight games and four settings/resolutions combinations four our standard test suite, and four more charts for our ray tracing suite that uses six complex DXR DirectX Raytracing games.Image credit Tom's HardwareNvidia's RTX 3090 Ti isn't remotely affordable, while the GeForce RTX 3080 and Radeon RX 6800 XT represent a better view of performance. Those two trade blows in traditional rasterization games, with AMD taking a slight lead, while Nvidia easily jumps ahead — often by a large margin — as soon as ray tracing and/or DLSS get turned on. We give Nvidia a slight lead at the top of the performance ladder, but that's not the only category to consider. Looking at the mainstream market $400, give or take, things get a bit messy. AMD's Radeon RX 6700 XT takes on the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti, with slightly better performance — provided once again that we ignore RT and DLSS. In our review, we called it a net tie. However, while AMD's card theoretically costs 20% more than Nvidia's offering, in practice pricing actually favors AMD right now $480 vs. $500 at the time of writing. Older model GPUs are mostly outclassed by the new arrivals, so the best pairing would be pitting the RTX 3050 against the RX 6600, both of which can be had for around $300 never mind MSRPs. AMD's GPU crushes the 3050 in standard gaming performance by 25–35%, and while ray tracing does favor the Nvidia GPUs by 7–15%, that's far less critical for this about budget offerings, like stuff for under $200? Sadly, we have to wonder where all the good budget GPUs have gone. The RX 6500 XT and RX 6400 sell for under $200, but performance is generally worse than the old RX 5500 XT 8GB and GTX 1660, instead going up against the GTX 1650 and 1650 Super. AMD's cards are easy enough to find brand new, while Nvidia's GTX 16-series parts are now coming up on three years old and supply and availability can be a bit spotty. Still, Newegg has GTX 1650 Super for $200, effectively making the budget sector a tie. Winner Tie This is simply too close to call, as there are so many ways to split things. Nvidia wins for 4K and ray tracing performance, AMD wins for standard 1080p and 1440p gaming, and also in performance at similar high-end and mid-range price points. DLSS also counts in Nvidia's favor, however, and while FSR might be relatively competitive, it works on any vs Nvidia Power Consumption and Efficiency Prior to AMD's Navi, GPU power efficiency was decidedly in favor of Nvidia. But Navi changed all that, and Big Navi has further improved AMD's efficiency. Using chips built with TSMC's 7nm FinFET process and a new architecture that delivered 50% better performance per watt, Navi started to close the gap. Except, it was so far behind that even a 50% improvement didn't fully address the efficiency deficiency. But Nvidia's Ampere architecture pushed higher clocks at the cost of efficiency, while AMD's Big Navi gets a healthy boost in efficiency from the Infinity Cache. The net result is that Ampere and Big Navi are pretty close to tied. Using Powenetics hardware to capture the real graphics card power use of GPUs, we've tested all of the current and recent graphics cards from both companies. We've also tested third party cards from both sides, but we'll confine the charts to the reference designs as much as possible.Image credit Tom's HardwareWhile power use favored Nvidia's older GPUs, sometimes by a wide margin, the differences on the latest generation hardware go the other way. RTX 3090 Ti uses the most power, followed by the RX 6950 XT, RTX 3080 12GB custom card, and then we get the RTX 3090, 3080 Ti, and 3080. AMD's RX 6900 XT and 6800 XT come next, before we start getting to previous generation GPUs. It's more difficult to declare a winner outside of the extreme performance range. AMD's RX 6700 XT uses a bit more power than the RTX 3060 Ti and a bit less than the RTX 3070, but they're all in a 10W range. Drop down to the RTX 3060 and RTX 3050 against the RX 6600 XT and RX 6600, and power use tracks pretty closely with budget GPUs, the RX 6500 XT uses more power than the GTX 1650, but the RX 6400 is the only truly modern GPU that doesn't need at least a PCIe 6-pin power AMD Focusing just on the current generation AMD Big Navi and Nvidia Ampere GPUs, power and efficiency are relatively close. AMD takes a slight lead at the top, the middle's a tie, and AMD wins in the budget sector as well, giving it the overall nod. TSMC's N7 process also factors in, helping out AMD, while Nvidia's use of Samsung 8N likely accounts for reduced overall vs Nvidia Featured Technology Most of the features supported by AMD and Nvidia seem similar, though the implementations do vary. Both support ray tracing now, which allows for some nice effects, but it's not required to get a good gaming experience. Nvidia's DLSS is a bigger factor, as FidelityFX Super Resolution FSR doesn't look as good in the FSR implementation, while FSR isn't widely adopted yet — and in either case, FSR works on AMD and Nvidia GPUs, and even Intel integrated graphics. That's actually a point to AMD for not locking people into its hardware, but practically speaking there are a lot of games with DLSS support and it can be an nice extra. There are other aspects as well. G-Sync takes on FreeSync, Radeon Anti-Lag goes up against Nvidia's ultra-low latency mode plus Reflex, Radeon Super Resolution RSR works in a similar way to Nvidia Image Scaling NIS, and there other areas where features effectively match up as aren't the rays you're looking to trace. Image credit ShutterstockSupporting the same APIs and similar hardware features doesn't make things equivalent, however. Ampere and RDNA2 also support mesh shaders and variable rate shading VRS, as well as some other features that are all part of the DirectX 12 Ultimate spec. But Nvidia's performance in ray tracing tends to be quite a bit higher than AMD, even without DLSS. While FreeSync and G-Sync might seem equivalent on the surface, the best G-Sync displays are almost invariably higher quality and better latency than FreeSync displays. The same goes for AMD's anti-lag and Nvidia's ultra-low latency and Reflex Similar in theory, but in practice Reflex implementations come out on top. Video encoding and decoding are another important aspect, and here Nvidia definitely comes out ahead. The Turing and Ampere codecs support higher-quality encodes and lower GPU utilization, both good things. There's no need for CPU-based video encoding with Nvidia's latest GPUs. AMD's budget Navi 24 chips lack some key video encoding features as well. There is one area where AMD has a clear advantage, though it's also perhaps to AMD's detriment. TSMC's N7 process that AMD uses for RDNA2 and RDNA and Zen 3 and the PS5/XSX chips clearly delivers better performance and power characteristics than Samsung's custom 8N really just an improved version of Samsung's 10LPP process. The catch being that lots of other companies also want to partake of TSMC's goodness — AMD, Apple, Nvidia GA100, Qualcomm, and even Intel all use TSMC, along with various other smaller players. This becomes a problem when TSMC doesn't have enough capacity to meet the demands of all of those companies. Winner Nvidia While AMD and Nvidia have superficial parity on most features, Nvidia's implementations are generally superior — and cost more. G-Sync, Reflex, DLSS, and NVENC all end up being at least slightly better than AMD's vs Nvidia Drivers and Software Trying to determine a clear winner in the drivers and software category is difficult. Quite a few people previously encountered black screen issues with AMD drivers on RX 5000 Navi series GPUs, while others didn't have any difficulties. Newer drivers have fixed these problems, as far as we can tell. Nvidia drivers aren't foolproof either, and depending on the game and hardware, issues crop up for both companies. But is one company doing better with drivers? Image credit ShutterstockAMD makes a lot of noise about its yearly driver overhaul. The Radeon Adrenalin 2020 drivers consolidated everything under one large umbrella, aiming to simplify things, though it can be confusing at first if you're used to the older drivers. AMD tends to skip WHQL Windows Hardware Quality Labs testing, which means fewer hoops to jump through and potentially more bugs slip through, but Microsoft's insurance of a minimum level of functionality doesn't really mean much for gaming purposes. You can generally count on at least one new AMD driver per month, often more if there are major game launches. Nvidia's driver schedule follows a similar cadence. You'll get new drivers for major game launches or new graphics card hardware. Nvidia's releases outside of rare hotfixes are all WHQL certified, and Nvidia also has a separate Studio Driver branch for content creators. One of the big differences between AMD and Nvidia drivers is that Nvidia has two separate user interfaces. The Nvidia Control Panel handles things like resolutions and certain graphics settings, while GeForce Experience tackles game optimizations, driver updates, and extra features including ShadowPlay, Ansel, NIS, and more. Annoyingly, you have to log in and solve a captcha prompt to use GeForce Experience, which is something I've done more times than I’d ever want to count. Just say no to data mining plus drivers. Winner Tie We prefer AMD's unified driver approach, as it's one less interface to navigate, but there's just so much stuff in the current releases. Nvidia's Q&A is arguably better, though plenty of bugs and issues end up slipping through on both sides. Quantifying drivers ends up being an incredibly subjective affair, however, so we're calling this one a draw as vs Nvidia Pricing and AvailabilityWho offers the better value in the battle of AMD vs Nvidia? The past two years have been a bit of a joke not a funny one, either, but things are now greatly improved. You can find all the latest graphics cards in stock at retail now, with many models selling at or below MSRP. But of the "many" selling at or below MSRP, far more are using AMD GPUs than Nvidia GPUs, with only the extremely priced RTX 3080 Ti and above selling below MSRP from Team Green. Our GPU pricing index looks at eBay pricing as an alternative, but it's no longer required. In general, the simple fact is that the best values are currently from AMD, with the RX 6600, RX 6600 XT, RX 6650 XT, RX 6700 XT, and RX 6750 XT all ranking near the top of the FPS per dollar charts. Nvidia's RTX 3060, 3050, and 3060 Ti aren't horribly option, but you're paying about 15–25% more in terms of FPS per dollar and getting DLSS for that money.Image credit ShutterstockAt the top of the pricing spectrum, the RTX 3090 Ti is the unquestioned worst value, priced at over $1,800 and only delivering slightly more performance than the RTX 3080 Ti. AMD's RX 6950 XT doesn't cost nearly as much and competes well against the 3080 Ti, but as we go down the pricing scale things begin to favor AMD a lot more. Right now, the RX 6600 takes top honors with around fps per dollar spent. Nvidia's highest ranking GPUs come from its previous generation Turing RTX 20-series, where the RTX 2060 scores FPS/$, but the highest RTX 30-series part only rates FPS/$. AMD's RX 6500 XT is right in the mix for a budget card, also at FPS/$. Winner AMD With the supply of graphics cards greatly improving, at least partly thanks to cryptocurrency mining profitability being in the dumps, the value proposition finally becomes meaningful again for the first time in about two years. GPU prices continue to drop, but for now AMD's RX 6000-series cards represent a better value than Nvidia's RTX 30-series to scroll horizontallyRoundNvidia GeForceAMD RadeonGaming Performance✗✗Power ConsumptionRow 1 - Cell 1 ✗Featured Technology✗Row 2 - Cell 2 Drivers and Software✗✗Price and ValueRow 4 - Cell 1 ✗Total34AMD vs Nvidia Bottom Line With an overall score of four to three, AMD squeaks out a victory and lays claim to the king of the GPU world crown. Cue the band and light the fireworks. That doesn't mean AMD GPUs are a better choice in every case, and there's a lot of fuzzy math and subjectivity involved, but you should be well served by Team Red's RDNA 2 GPUs — and just about equally well served by Team Green. Overall, which GPU you prefer will likely come down to personal preference rather than hard numbers. AMD clearly wins most match ups comparing similar priced cards in standard benchmarks, but it falls behind in ray tracing games and DLSS still factors in. We could certainly see people being willing to pay 10–15% more money to get an Nvidia card, even if it may not technically be the "best" choice. At this point, we're now looking forward to the future RDNA 3 and Ada Lovelace graphics cards, both of which we expect to see before the end of the year. There are still too many unknowns to even venture a guess at who will be on top by the end of the year, but hopefully the end of 2022 ends up being far better for gamers looking to upgrade their GPU than 2020 and 2021 were. Join the experts who read Tom's Hardware for the inside track on enthusiast PC tech news — and have for over 25 years. We'll send breaking news and in-depth reviews of CPUs, GPUs, AI, maker hardware and more straight to your inbox. Jarred Walton is a senior editor at Tom's Hardware focusing on everything GPU. He has been working as a tech journalist since 2004, writing for AnandTech, Maximum PC, and PC Gamer. From the first S3 Virge '3D decelerators' to today's GPUs, Jarred keeps up with all the latest graphics trends and is the one to ask about game performance. Most Popular

kwd69jfx67.pages.dev/172

kwd69jfx67.pages.dev/746

kwd69jfx67.pages.dev/427

kwd69jfx67.pages.dev/328

kwd69jfx67.pages.dev/608

kwd69jfx67.pages.dev/646

kwd69jfx67.pages.dev/233

kwd69jfx67.pages.dev/81

kwd69jfx67.pages.dev/463

kwd69jfx67.pages.dev/254

kwd69jfx67.pages.dev/931

kwd69jfx67.pages.dev/697

kwd69jfx67.pages.dev/794

kwd69jfx67.pages.dev/36

kwd69jfx67.pages.dev/27

perbedaan amd dan nvidia